xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: something very strange w/ filestreams...

To: Barry Naujok <bnaujok@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: something very strange w/ filestreams...
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 20:32:59 -0500
Cc: David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx>, xfs-oss <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <op.ty6ofbsm3jf8g2@pc-bnaujok.melbourne.sgi.com>
References: <46F49C80.60007@sandeen.net> <20070923092444.GQ995458@sgi.com> <op.ty4867zj3jf8g2@pc-bnaujok.melbourne.sgi.com> <46F7B04D.70809@sandeen.net> <op.ty6ofbsm3jf8g2@pc-bnaujok.melbourne.sgi.com>
Sender: xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Macintosh/20070728)
Barry Naujok wrote:

>>> So, before running this test, you should make sure your test
>>> partitions are completely zeroed from mkfs's that occurred
>>> before that recent version of mkfs.xfs was installed.
>> I dd'd over the whole test partition, ran the sequence, and hit the  
>> problem.
> 
> Yeah, worked it out yesterday but never got around to doing another
> email. It's a combination of the two filestreams tests which do
> small filesystems and mkfs.xfs doesn't wipe beyond the new
> filesystem size. Zero the disk, try the attached patch and see
> if that fixes the problem.
> 
> Barry.

Ok, but what about that double free?

-Eric


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>