| To: | Barry Naujok <bnaujok@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: something very strange w/ filestreams... |
| From: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 24 Sep 2007 20:32:59 -0500 |
| Cc: | David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx>, xfs-oss <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <op.ty6ofbsm3jf8g2@pc-bnaujok.melbourne.sgi.com> |
| References: | <46F49C80.60007@sandeen.net> <20070923092444.GQ995458@sgi.com> <op.ty4867zj3jf8g2@pc-bnaujok.melbourne.sgi.com> <46F7B04D.70809@sandeen.net> <op.ty6ofbsm3jf8g2@pc-bnaujok.melbourne.sgi.com> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Macintosh/20070728) |
Barry Naujok wrote: >>> So, before running this test, you should make sure your test >>> partitions are completely zeroed from mkfs's that occurred >>> before that recent version of mkfs.xfs was installed. >> I dd'd over the whole test partition, ran the sequence, and hit the >> problem. > > Yeah, worked it out yesterday but never got around to doing another > email. It's a combination of the two filestreams tests which do > small filesystems and mkfs.xfs doesn't wipe beyond the new > filesystem size. Zero the disk, try the attached patch and see > if that fixes the problem. > > Barry. Ok, but what about that double free? -Eric |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] lose xfs_hex_dump in favor of print_hex_dump, Eric Sandeen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] cleanup vnode useage in xfs_dm.c, Vlad Apostolov |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: something very strange w/ filestreams..., Barry Naujok |
| Next by Thread: | Re: something very strange w/ filestreams..., Eric Sandeen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |