| To: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: state of the cvs tree |
| From: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 13 Sep 2007 09:50:31 -0500 |
| Cc: | Mark Goodwin <markgw@xxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20070913104000.GB3351@lst.de> |
| References: | <20070912121938.GA16870@lst.de> <46E870AB.30906@sgi.com> <20070913104000.GB3351@lst.de> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Thunderbird 1.5.0.12 (X11/20070530) |
Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Then I have a patch from Eric sitting in the front of my queue, > > "[PATCH V2] refactor xfs_mountfs for clarity & stack savings" > > which might be a little too big for 2.6.24, but should at least go into > CVS ASAP. I think Eric would be really happy to see it in 2.6.24 aswell > because that means FC8 could actually mount xfs out of the box without > running out of stack or something. Yes ;-) I've got that patch in Fedora now, but it'd be great to have it come via upstream. -Eric |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Configuring XFS on Redhat Linux, Eric Sandeen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: compression, Bhagi rathi |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: state of the cvs tree, Christoph Hellwig |
| Next by Thread: | Re: state of the cvs tree, David Chinner |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |