| To: | James Braid <jamesb@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: New CentOS4/RHEL4-compatible xfs module rpms |
| From: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 21 Jul 2007 09:58:30 -0500 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <73EF8A3A-4768-4717-88B4-57A2E00D4E02@loreland.org> |
| References: | <4560AB84.9060200@sandeen.net> <48478.193.203.83.22.1184855825.squirrel@colo.loreland.org> <469F8005.3080104@sandeen.net> <73EF8A3A-4768-4717-88B4-57A2E00D4E02@loreland.org> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.5 (Macintosh/20070716) |
James Braid wrote: > On 19 Jul 2007, at 16:15, Eric Sandeen wrote: >> That's odd. You have the module on the server, exporting an xfs >> filesystem, and you're getting permission denied on the client? > > Yep. And rmmod'ing the updated XFS module and insmod'ing the older > module makes it work again. Interesting - what are the exact versions of "updated" and "older" that you are using? I'll look at the diff... Thanks, -Eric > (yeah, in an ideal world we'd just run the latest kernel, but we're > stuck on RHEL4 for a bunch of reasons and XFS is so much better than > ext3 for our purposes, even with the old crufty version in the RHEL4 > kernel) > |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: New CentOS4/RHEL4-compatible xfs module rpms, James Braid |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | xfs-cmds doesn't build... (cvs & 2.9.2...), Eric Sandeen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: New CentOS4/RHEL4-compatible xfs module rpms, James Braid |
| Next by Thread: | Re: New CentOS4/RHEL4-compatible xfs module rpms, James Braid |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |