Jesper Juhl wrote:
> (this is back from May 16 2007, resending since it doesn't look like
> the patch ever made it in anywhere)
>
>
Weird, looks like it's in cvs...
http://oss.sgi.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/xfs-linux/xfs_vnodeops.c.diff?r1=text&tr1=1.699&r2=text&tr2=1.698&f=h
but not in git.
-Eric
> Fix XFS memory leak; allocated transaction not freed in
> xfs_inactive_free_eofblocks() in failure case.
>
> the code allocates a transaction, but in the case where 'truncate' is
> !=0 and xfs_itruncate_start(ip, XFS_ITRUNC_DEFINITE, 0); happens to return
> an error, we'll just return from the function without dealing with the
> memory allocated byxfs_trans_alloc() and assigned to 'tp', thus it'll be
> orphaned/leaked - not good.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> fs/xfs/xfs_vnodeops.c | 1 +
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_vnodeops.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_vnodeops.c
> index de17aed..32519cf 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_vnodeops.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_vnodeops.c
> @@ -1260,6 +1260,7 @@ xfs_inactive_free_eofblocks(
> error = xfs_itruncate_start(ip, XFS_ITRUNC_DEFINITE,
> ip->i_size);
> if (error) {
> + xfs_trans_cancel(tp, 0);
> xfs_iunlock(ip, XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL);
> return error;
> }
>
>
>
|