xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Review: dmapi-devel RPM should required xfsprogs-devel RPM

To: Barry Naujok <bnaujok@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Review: dmapi-devel RPM should required xfsprogs-devel RPM
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 09:29:39 -0500
Cc: "xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx" <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs-dev <xfs-dev@xxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <op.ttwa4bv73jf8g2@pc-bnaujok.melbourne.sgi.com>
References: <op.ttwa4bv73jf8g2@pc-bnaujok.melbourne.sgi.com>
Sender: xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (Macintosh/20070326)
Barry Naujok wrote:
> As per the subject (and also mentioned in the description):
> 
> --- a/dmapi/build/rpm/dmapi.spec.in     2007-06-14 15:02:13.000000000 +1000
> +++ b/dmapi/build/rpm/dmapi.spec.in     2007-06-14 14:47:31.290063558 +1000
> @@ -23,7 +23,7 @@
>   %package devel
>   Summary: Data Management API static libraries and headers.
>   Group: Development/Libraries
> -Requires: @pkg_name@ >= 2.0.4
> +Requires: @pkg_name@ >= 2.0.4 xfsprogs-devel
> 
>   %description devel
>   dmapi-devel contains the libraries and header files needed to
> 
> 

seems sane to me.  Just a header issue I guess?

-eric


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>