| To: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: ways to restore data from crashed disk |
| From: | Jaap Struyk <japie@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 08 Jun 2007 06:03:43 +0200 |
| In-reply-to: | <46685C5F.5090804@sandeen.net> |
| References: | <465EA882.3030403@deserver.nl> <465ECF9B.2000500@sandeen.net> <46684A9B.90908@deserver.nl> <46685C5F.5090804@sandeen.net> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (X11/20070326) |
Eric Sandeen schreef: > when you are talking about sizes, do you mean space used (du) or max > offset (ls -l?) max offset should be the same for your image file as > for your original device... 120G. ls -l But I don't know what tot trust anymore, if I look with gparted at my partitions the old disk gaves me a partition of 140G with 106G used space. My new disk has a partition of 200G with 166G used space. If I create a new xfs partition it has about 10% used space (according to gparted, I suspect thats the size of the logfiles?) so from the 166G on the new disk 146G is the "real" used space so that should be the size of the image file. (nomather what ls -l tells me) Is this correct? -- Groetjes Japie |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] use filldir internally, David Chinner |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Review: Be smarter about handling ENOSPC during writeback, Timothy Shimmin |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: ways to restore data from crashed disk, Eric Sandeen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: ways to restore data from crashed disk, Eric Sandeen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |