| To: | Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Kernel 2.6.22-rc3 safe to migrate to? |
| From: | Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 02 Jun 2007 15:54:09 -0700 |
| Cc: | linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.64.0706021723480.22318@p34.internal.lan> |
| References: | <Pine.LNX.4.64.0706021723480.22318@p34.internal.lan> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (X11/20070302) |
Justin Piszcz wrote: > Wondering as their were a lot of XFS related issues early on in > development..? The 2.6.22-rc3 kernel has the core 2 duo coretemp patch > by ruik which I want be running as long as 2.6.22-rc3 does not have > any severe XFS issues? XFS currently has a data-corrupting bug, where files which were appended by small amounts may lose their updates on umount - I see this corrupting hg repos. There's a patch which works for me, and is in 2.6.22-rc3-mm1, but it hasn't been merged upstream yet. J |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: corruption bug in 2.6.17, Christian Kujau |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Kernel 2.6.22-rc3 safe to migrate to?, Justin Piszcz |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Kernel 2.6.22-rc3 safe to migrate to?, Justin Piszcz |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Kernel 2.6.22-rc3 safe to migrate to?, Justin Piszcz |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |