| To: | Andi Kleen <andi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Review: Concurrent Multi-File Data Streams |
| From: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 12 May 2007 22:08:56 -0500 |
| Cc: | David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx>, xfs-dev <xfs-dev@xxxxxxx>, xfs-oss <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <p73sla1ev7o.fsf@bingen.suse.de> |
| References: | <20070511003606.GB85884050@sgi.com> <p73sla1ev7o.fsf@bingen.suse.de> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (Macintosh/20070326) |
Andi Kleen wrote: Also centisecs is a really ugly unit whose use should be probably not propagated. Hmm at one point I thought the preferred unit for this sort of tuneable *was* centisecs. What's the unit du jour? [root@neon ~]# sysctl -a |grep cent vm.dirty_expire_centisecs = 2999 vm.dirty_writeback_centisecs = 499 fs.xfs.age_buffer_centisecs = 1500 fs.xfs.xfsbufd_centisecs = 100 fs.xfs.xfssyncd_centisecs = 3000 I think xfs was following the vm lead at one point. -Eric |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: updatedb triggers XFS internal error, Eric Sandeen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Review: Concurrent Multi-File Data Streams, Christoph Hellwig |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Review: Concurrent Multi-File Data Streams, Andi Kleen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Review: Concurrent Multi-File Data Streams - centisecs, Timothy Shimmin |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |