xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Should xfs_repair take this long?

To: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Should xfs_repair take this long?
From: Thomas Walker <walker@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 07:27:08 -0400
Sender: xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050317)

I am trying to restore a corrupt xfs partition. It is 6TB total, it is an LVM of two 3TB fiber channel SAN volumes. The host is running RHEL4, 2.6.9-42.0.2.ELsmp, and the version of xfsprogs is xfsprogs-2.6.13-2. The host has four threaded AMD Opterons, 4GB of RAM and 2GB of swap located on an internal SCSI disk. It is unclear how the xfs partition was damaged, but it reports a bad superblock and will not mount. I am running this command;


xfs_repair -o assume_xfs /dev/mapper/vg0-hladata3

This command has been running for two days now. There is cpu activity and i/o activity on the physical SAN. There is some swapping but not an unusual amount and swapon -s shows only a small amount in use. I have seen information implying xfs_repair needs a large amount of memory to work well, otherwise it will take a long time. My question is, giving my setup, is there an estimate of how long I should wait before expecting a result? Should I add swap space? Is there anything else I should do?

   thanks in advance for any help.

   Thomas Walker


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>