James Braid schrieb:
> I'm now seeing the following output - it's been sitting at this point for
> over 13 hours now... earlier versions of xfs_repair would finish quite a
> bit faster. Any ideas whats going on?
>
> - 03:00:37: traversing filesystem - 0 of 55 allocation groups done
> - 03:15:37: traversing filesystem - 0 of 55 allocation groups done
> - 03:30:37: traversing filesystem - 0 of 55 allocation groups done
> - 03:45:37: traversing filesystem - 0 of 55 allocation groups done
> - 04:00:37: traversing filesystem - 0 of 55 allocation groups done
> - 04:15:37: traversing filesystem - 0 of 55 allocation groups done
> - 04:30:37: traversing filesystem - 0 of 55 allocation groups done
> - 04:45:37: traversing filesystem - 0 of 55 allocation groups done
> - 05:00:37: traversing filesystem - 0 of 55 allocation groups done
> - 05:15:37: traversing filesystem - 0 of 55 allocation groups done
> - 05:30:37: traversing filesystem - 0 of 55 allocation groups done
> - 05:45:37: traversing filesystem - 0 of 55 allocation groups done
> - 06:00:37: traversing filesystem - 0 of 55 allocation groups done
> - 06:15:37: traversing filesystem - 0 of 55 allocation groups done
> - 06:30:37: traversing filesystem - 0 of 55 allocation groups done
> - 06:45:37: traversing filesystem - 0 of 55 allocation groups done
> - 07:00:37: traversing filesystem - 0 of 55 allocation groups done
> - 07:15:37: traversing filesystem - 0 of 55 allocation groups done
> - 07:30:37: traversing filesystem - 0 of 55 allocation groups done
> - 07:45:37: traversing filesystem - 0 of 55 allocation groups done
> - 08:00:37: traversing filesystem - 0 of 55 allocation groups done
> - 08:15:37: traversing filesystem - 0 of 55 allocation groups done
> - 08:30:37: traversing filesystem - 0 of 55 allocation groups done
> - 08:45:37: traversing filesystem - 0 of 55 allocation groups done
> - 09:00:37: traversing filesystem - 0 of 55 allocation groups done
> - 09:15:37: traversing filesystem - 0 of 55 allocation groups done
> - 09:30:37: traversing filesystem - 0 of 55 allocation groups done
> - 09:45:37: traversing filesystem - 0 of 55 allocation groups done
> - 10:00:37: traversing filesystem - 0 of 55 allocation groups done
> - 10:15:37: traversing filesystem - 0 of 55 allocation groups done
> - 10:30:37: traversing filesystem - 0 of 55 allocation groups done
>
>
>
>> Running 2.8.18 xfs_repair on a largeish (65TB, ~70M inodes) filesystem on
>> an x86_64 machine gives the following "progress" output:
>>
>> 12:15:36: process known inodes and inode discovery - 1461632 of 0 inod
>> es done
>> 12:15:36: Phase 3: elapsed time 14 minutes, 32 seconds - processed 100
>> 571 inodes per minute
>> 12:15:36: Phase 3: 0% done - estimated remaining time 3364 weeks, 3 da
>> ys, 7 hours, 30 minutes, 45 seconds
>>
>> Is this a known bug?
Hi James,
why do you think that this is a bug? You have an almost infinitely large
filesystem, so the file-system check will also run for an almost
infinitely long time ;-).
You see, not all that's possible is really desirable.
Ciao
Klaus
Btw. i wouldn't expect this xfs_repair run to finish without running out
of memory :-(.
--
Mit freundlichen Grüssen / best regards
Klaus Strebel, Dipl.-Inform. (FH), mailto:klaus.strebel@xxxxxxx
/"\
\ / ASCII RIBBON CAMPAIGN
X AGAINST HTML MAIL
/ \
|