| To: | geir.myrestrand@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: New CentOS4/RHEL4-compatible xfs module rpms |
| From: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 07 Dec 2006 16:18:41 -0600 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, nscott@xxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <457892BB.1000203@falconstor.com> |
| References: | <4560AB84.9060200@sandeen.net> <45784E71.4080605@falconstor.com> <457854CB.5030507@sandeen.net> <45787ED4.5070801@falconstor.com> <1165525906.30459.25.camel@edge> <45788927.4030207@falconstor.com> <1165527628.30459.31.camel@edge> <45788CD1.9010509@falconstor.com> <1165529205.30459.36.camel@edge> <457892BB.1000203@falconstor.com> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (X11/20061107) |
Geir A. Myrestrand wrote: > Nathan Scott wrote: >> On Thu, 2006-12-07 at 16:51 -0500, Geir A. Myrestrand wrote: >>> Sorry Nathan, but I'm not sure I understand what you refer to with >>> "test out the latest" --are you referring to the kernel or XFS? >> Yes. :) Current mainline kernels, or CVS from oss.sgi.com would >> have this fix I'm thinking of. > > Thanks for the "clarification"... ;-) > > I'll try to update the XFS code first, hopefully it won't break too many > of the patches Eric had in his source RPM...but I will try to correct > them if they fail to apply cleanly... > > I'll keep you posted. > I would just get kernel-2.6.19 and run the test, see if it's fixed upstream, don't worry about merging & munging xfs code from one place o another... -Eric |
| Previous by Date: | Re: New CentOS4/RHEL4-compatible xfs module rpms, Geir A. Myrestrand |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: New CentOS4/RHEL4-compatible xfs module rpms, Geir A. Myrestrand |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: New CentOS4/RHEL4-compatible xfs module rpms, Geir A. Myrestrand |
| Next by Thread: | Re: New CentOS4/RHEL4-compatible xfs module rpms, Geir A. Myrestrand |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |