xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: New CentOS4/RHEL4-compatible xfs module rpms

To: nscott@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: New CentOS4/RHEL4-compatible xfs module rpms
From: "Geir A. Myrestrand" <geir.myrestrand@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2006 16:51:13 -0500
Cc: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <1165527628.30459.31.camel@edge>
Organization: FalconStor Software, Inc.
References: <4560AB84.9060200@sandeen.net> <45784E71.4080605@falconstor.com> <457854CB.5030507@sandeen.net> <45787ED4.5070801@falconstor.com> <1165525906.30459.25.camel@edge> <45788927.4030207@falconstor.com> <1165527628.30459.31.camel@edge>
Reply-to: geir.myrestrand@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (Windows/20061025)
Nathan Scott wrote:
On Thu, 2006-12-07 at 16:35 -0500, Geir A. Myrestrand wrote:
It wouldn't be easy for me to switch to a newer kernel, because it is not just a matter of my machine --we have a product built for this particular configuration. Switching to a new kernel would reset our QA efforts.

You misunderstood me I think - I didn't suggest switching kernels, just that you test out the latest. If its OK, then its relatively easy to search for a change that fixed it. If its not OK, then theres a bug in mainline which should get some attention too.

Sorry Nathan, but I'm not sure I understand what you refer to with "test out the latest" --are you referring to the kernel or XFS?


--

Geir A. Myrestrand


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>