xfs
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: TAKE 957159 - Reduce XFS 4k stack kernel issues

from [Eric Sandeen] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: TAKE 957159 - Reduce XFS 4k stack kernel issues
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 15:16:21 -0600
Cc: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20061130080359.E3F7C58FF58B@chook.melbourne.sgi.com>
References: <20061130080359.E3F7C58FF58B@chook.melbourne.sgi.com>
Sender: xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (X11/20061107) 
David, did this add any new static declarations, or just get the
existing ones into shape?

IOW, I think I should rework my make-more-things-static patch?

-Eric
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: inode64 workaround, Deanan
Next by Date:  Re: Review: Reduce in-core superblock lock contention near ENOSPC, David Chinner
Previous by Thread:  TAKE 957159 - Reduce XFS 4k stack kernel issues, David Chinner
Next by Thread:  Re: TAKE 957159 - Reduce XFS 4k stack kernel issues, David Chinner
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]