xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: inode64 workaround

To: Deanan <delusion@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: inode64 workaround
From: David Chatterton <chatz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 11:47:44 +1100
Cc: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <456E1B08.7090802@delusion.com>
Organization: SGI
References: <200611290027.AA04740@TNESG9305.tnes.nec.co.jp> <1164838985.4992.30.camel@edge> <456E1B08.7090802@delusion.com>
Reply-to: chatz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (Windows/20061025)
Deanan,

Would something like the inode rotor help?

  fs.xfs.rotorstep              (Min: 1  Default: 1  Max: 256)

        In "inode32" allocation mode, this option determines how many

        files the allocator attempts to allocate in the same allocation

        group before moving to the next allocation group.  The intent

        is to control the rate at which the allocator moves between

        allocation groups when allocating extents for new files.

David


Deanan wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I've got some systems that I can't change the kernel on (external
> vendor) that
> are 32bit but I'm running into the performance problem that is fixed by
> using
> inode64. Is there any known way of working around the problem on a 32bit
> kernel?
> 
> In our case, the problem occurs as soon as you start to delete files and
> write new ones.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Deanan
> 

-- 
David Chatterton
XFS Engineering Manager
SGI Australia


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>