xfs
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: [PATCH] (and bad attr2 bug) - pack xfs_sb_t for 64-bit arches

from [Eric Sandeen] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: Timothy Shimmin <tes@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] (and bad attr2 bug) - pack xfs_sb_t for 64-bit arches
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 09:44:02 -0600
Cc: Russell Cattelan <cattelan@xxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <5A1AC29043EE33BEB778198A@timothy-shimmins-power-mac-g5.local>
References: <455CB54F.8080901@sandeen.net> <455CE1E3.7020703@sandeen.net> <45612621.5010404@sandeen.net> <45627A4D.3020502@sandeen.net> <1164157336.19915.43.camel@xenon.msp.redhat.com> <5A1AC29043EE33BEB778198A@timothy-shimmins-power-mac-g5.local>
Sender: xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (Macintosh/20061025)
Timothy Shimmin wrote: 
Thanks, Russell.

I've been going thru the irc and just started looking at the patch.
I'll get back to you about it tomorrow.

I agree it would be good to have the fixed forkoff for data btree roots
as the first fix. And look into redoing the btree root for a later change.


My only question is, how much does this defeat the purpose of attr2?

-Eric


[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: [PATCH] (and bad attr2 bug) - pack xfs_sb_t for 64-bit arches, Timothy Shimmin
Next by Date:  Re: [PATCH 1/2] Make stuff static, Eric Sandeen
Previous by Thread:  Re: [PATCH] (and bad attr2 bug) - pack xfs_sb_t for 64-bit arches, Timothy Shimmin
Next by Thread:  Re: [PATCH] (and bad attr2 bug) - pack xfs_sb_t for 64-bit arches, Russell Cattelan
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]