| To: | Timothy Shimmin <tes@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: mount failed after xfs_growfs beyond 16 TB |
| From: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 05 Nov 2006 21:25:13 -0600 |
| Cc: | David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx>, Christian Guggenberger <christian.guggenberger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <FFDFD6610F310171562D474B@timothy-shimmins-power-mac-g5.local> |
| References: | <20061102172608.GA27769@pc51072.physik.uni-regensburg.de> <20061103004142.GI8394166@melbourne.sgi.com> <454B5833.9030008@sandeen.net> <FFDFD6610F310171562D474B@timothy-shimmins-power-mac-g5.local> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (Macintosh/20060909) |
Timothy Shimmin wrote:
Good idea, Eric. I've created a pv. I noticed this was taken from xfs_mount_validate_sb() for the dblocks test.
I guess it would be nice to abstract this test in a macro for use in multiple places. yep, it'd just need to be refactored a bit to support data only & rt only (for growfs), while mount wants to check both at the same time. -Eric
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: mount failed after xfs_growfs beyond 16 TB, Timothy Shimmin |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Weird performance decrease, Sascha Nitsch |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: mount failed after xfs_growfs beyond 16 TB, Timothy Shimmin |
| Next by Thread: | Adding xfs to kernel 2.4.20, Uri Rotshtein |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |