Re: review: greedy allocator vs kmflags

[Vlad Apostolov <vapo@xxxxxxx>]

Nathan Scott wrote:
> Hi Vlad,
>
> This is the last iteration on updating the greedy alloc routine to
> be more generic and properly handle the passed in flags wrt sleep or
> nosleep (following up on Dave's suggestion, and someone else to me
> privately, offlist).  Could you give it a final review for me?
>
> thanks.
>
>   
It is looking good Nathan. One thing I noticed today when I was building 
the modules
was that kmem_zalloc_greedy() is already in use in several places. There
were a few warnings about type mismatch of the first argument "size_t 
*size" and
missing kmem_zalloc_greedy symbol at the end. Not sure if this is 
important but just
thought to mention it.

Regards,
Vlad