| To: | Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: XFS + software raid + 4k stacks = BOOM? |
| From: | Stefan Smietanowski <stesmi@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 10 Jun 2006 06:33:55 +0200 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20060610140105.C775761@wobbly.melbourne.sgi.com> |
| References: | <4489968E.7070102@stesmi.com> <20060610140105.C775761@wobbly.melbourne.sgi.com> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.8-1.1.fc4 (X11/20060501) |
Nathan Scott wrote: > On Fri, Jun 09, 2006 at 05:41:02PM +0200, Stefan Smietanowski wrote: > >>I was wondering if the above config will work or if it's still >>considered "if it breaks you get to keep the broken stack" ? >>... > > > We are unaware of any remaining XFS issues with 4K stacks... so, > let us know if anything does go BOOM. > > cheers. > Will do. Running some tests now that will take a while. (Test is run using FC5 latest everything). // Stefan
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: XFS + software raid + 4k stacks = BOOM?, Nathan Scott |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: XFS + software raid + 4k stacks = BOOM?, James Pearson |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: XFS + software raid + 4k stacks = BOOM?, Nathan Scott |
| Next by Thread: | Re: XFS + software raid + 4k stacks = BOOM?, James Pearson |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |