| To: | Roger Willcocks <roger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Not being able to recover a RAID 5 20 Tb partition, help needed |
| From: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 29 Jan 2014 08:18:24 -0600 |
| Cc: | "sillero@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <sillero@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx" <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Delivered-to: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <1391004421.4294.68.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <1391002795.2573.79.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <52E90998.5050805@xxxxxxxxxxx> <1391004421.4294.68.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Those are ancient comments from IRIX versions. If he's using device mapper I suppose it is Linux after all. :) Eric > On Jan 29, 2014, at 8:07 AM, Roger Willcocks <roger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Wed, 2014-01-29 at 08:00 -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote: > >>> The system is setup as follow: >>> XFS 6.1 >> >> Is this some variant of RHEL6.1? XFS doesn't have version numbers >> like that. (Probably not IRIX 6.1?) :) > > See xfs_sb.h - > > #define XFS_SB_MAGIC 0x58465342 /* 'XFSB' */ > #define XFS_SB_VERSION_1 1 /* 5.3, 6.0.1, 6.1 */ > #define XFS_SB_VERSION_2 2 /* 6.2 - attributes */ > #define XFS_SB_VERSION_3 3 /* 6.2 - new inode > version */ > #define XFS_SB_VERSION_4 4 /* 6.2+ - bitmask > version */ > > > -- > Roger Willcocks <roger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Not being able to recover a RAID 5 20 Tb partition, help needed, Roger Willcocks |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Question regarding XFS on LVM over hardware RAID., C. Morgan Hamill |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Not being able to recover a RAID 5 20 Tb partition, help needed, Roger Willcocks |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Not being able to recover a RAID 5 20 Tb partition, help needed, Roger Willcocks |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |