Ludek Finstrle wrote:
Here's the output of xfs_info for the problematic one :
Here is my xfs_info:
# xfs_info /dev/md9
meta-data=/ isize=256 agcount=8, agsize=163856 blks
= sectsz=512
data = bsize=4096 blocks=1310752, imaxpct=25
= sunit=16 swidth=32 blks, unwritten=0
naming =version 2 bsize=4096
log =internal bsize=4096 blocks=1200, version=1
= sectsz=512 sunit=0 blks
realtime =none extsz=131072 blocks=0, rtextents=0
Ok, nothing odd about isize, sectsize, bsize.... thanks.
It would also be interesting to see the xfs_repair output, and xfs_bmap
(-v and -a) output of the problematic files prior to running xfs_fsr, if
possible.
I don't know which files will be problematic after xfs_fsr.
Ah, I suppose not :)
I'm sorry, I don't have enough time till Friday. Then I'll try to play
with the problem.
Thanks, I appreciate it... we're trying to reproduce it here.
-Eric
|