xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: XFS, 4K stacks, and Red Hat

To: Joshua Baker-LePain <jlb17@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: XFS, 4K stacks, and Red Hat
From: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2005 10:41:44 -0500
Cc: Linux xfs mailing list <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0507071102460.4766@chaos.egr.duke.edu>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0507071102460.4766@chaos.egr.duke.edu>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2-1.3.3 (X11/20050513)
Joshua Baker-LePain wrote:
Can anyone summarize the current status of XFS and 4K stacks? There was recently a thread[1] on the nahant (RHEL4) mailing list where it was stated[2] that one reason for the exclusion of XFS in RHEL4 is the stack size issue. I'd love to see XFS in Red Hat, although of course I have no idea if they'd turn it on even if the stack size issues went away tomorrow. I'm just wondering what the view of this is from the SGI side.

Thanks.


[1] https://www.redhat.com/archives/nahant-list/2005-June/msg00280.html

[2] https://www.redhat.com/archives/nahant-list/2005-June/msg00304.html


I have my suspicions that they could find another reason if this one was not present - code is too complex, they have no expertise for support.... Ask them if they support NFS V4 on top of ext3 on top of multipathing on top of network block device with a 4K stack under low memory conditions..... they have all the component parts in their kernel.

Sorry about the attitude, but the whole fixed size stack and the continual
addition of layers of code is a little silly. Wait until iscsi initiators
make it into the picture, and throw in a crypto layer for good measure.

As for XFS and a 4K stack, I think it still boils down to a few edge cases,
I have not seen one in years, I am doing all my builds via nfs v3 with
tcp/ip to an XFS filesystem.

The only stack overflow I have seen recently has been attempting to get
device mapper multipath to work, I can make that overflow the stack just
trying to configure it.

Steve (who has an attitude problem this morning)


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>