| To: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | xfs_repair fatal error 990 |
| From: | Rob Benton <rob.benton@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 03 Jun 2005 22:52:56 -0500 |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (Windows/20040913) |
|
Hey guys I could use some help here. I know there's probably a way to
fix this but I don't know what it is. I am running Debian testing with
a linux 2.6.9 kernel. Last night some strange behavior started and I noticed messages from the kernel and xfs. So I did a reboot with a Knoppix CD I had and tried xfs_repair. After that I tried xfs_check. These were version 2.6.28 by the way. =========================================================================== root@ttyp0[knoppix]# xfs_repair /dev/hdb2 Phase 1 - find and verify superblock... Phase 2 - using internal log - zero log... - scan filesystem freespace and inode maps... - found root inode chunk Phase 3 - for each AG... - scan and clear agi unlinked lists... - process known inodes and perform inode discovery... - agno = 0 - agno = 1 - agno = 2 - agno = 3 - agno = 4 - agno = 5 - agno = 6 - agno = 7 - agno = 8 - agno = 9 - agno = 10 - agno = 11 - agno = 12 - agno = 13 correcting nblocks for inode 109931154, was 0 - counted 1 - agno = 14 correcting nblocks for inode 120423310, was 0 - counted 12 - agno = 15 correcting nblocks for inode 128288145, was 0 - counted 1 - process newly discovered inodes... Phase 4 - check for duplicate blocks... - setting up duplicate extent list... - clear lost+found (if it exists) ... - clearing existing "lost+found" inode - marking entry "lost+found" to be deleted - check for inodes claiming duplicate blocks... - agno = 0 - agno = 1 - agno = 2 - agno = 3 - agno = 4 - agno = 5 - agno = 6 - agno = 7 - agno = 8 - agno = 9 - agno = 10 - agno = 11 - agno = 12 - agno = 13 data fork in regular inode 109931154 claims used block 7613136 correcting nblocks for inode 109931154, was 1 - counted 0 - agno = 14 data fork in regular inode 120423310 claims used block 8137424 correcting nblocks for inode 120423310, was 12 - counted 0 - agno = 15 data fork in regular inode 128288145 claims used block 273104 correcting nblocks for inode 128288145, was 1 - counted 0 Phase 5 - rebuild AG headers and trees... - reset superblock... Phase 6 - check inode connectivity... - resetting contents of realtime bitmap and summary inodes - ensuring existence of lost+found directory - traversing filesystem starting at / ... rebuilding directory inode 128 - traversal finished ... - traversing all unattached subtrees ... - traversals finished ... - moving disconnected inodes to lost+found ... Phase 7 - verify and correct link counts... corrupt dinode 109931154, extent total = 1, nblocks = 0. Unmount and run xfs_repair. fatal error -- couldn't map inode 109931154, err = 990 root@0[knoppix]# xfs_check /dev/hdb2 bad nblocks 0 for inode 109931154, counted 1 bad nblocks 0 for inode 120423310, counted 12 bad nblocks 0 for inode 128288145, counted 1 =========================================================================== |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | "LEAFN node level is 1..." warning and suspicious circumstances., Kenneth Sumrall |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | kswapd causing giant load, Gaspar Bakos |
| Previous by Thread: | "LEAFN node level is 1..." warning and suspicious circumstances., Kenneth Sumrall |
| Next by Thread: | kswapd causing giant load, Gaspar Bakos |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |