xfs
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: Files >4GB in XFS realtime partition

from [Eric Sandeen] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: James Chapman <jchapman@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Files >4GB in XFS realtime partition
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2005 07:13:12 -0500
Cc: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <42A0438E.1070202@katalix.com>
References: <428B4CC0.70702@katalix.com> <20050603020224.GE1021@frodo> <42A0438E.1070202@katalix.com>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Macintosh/20050317)
James Chapman wrote: 
Hi Nathan,

Eric Sandeen asked me to reproduce this on an x86 but I've been unable to find time to do so yet. I'll get back to you as soon as I can. I'll try to test with a 2.4.29 kernel.

/james


James, testing Nathan's case with xfs_io on your normal arch would be good too, and more useful at this point. If that fails, I wonder how hard it would be for you to take ulibc out of the equation...

-Eric


[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: Files >4GB in XFS realtime partition, James Chapman
Next by Date:  Re: XFS w/RT, Eric Sandeen
Previous by Thread:  Re: Files >4GB in XFS realtime partition, James Chapman
Next by Thread:  TAKE 937235 - mkfs vs MD0/1, Nathan Scott
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]