xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: 4k stacks on 32-bit, 8k stacks on 64-bit

To: David Kewley <kewley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: 4k stacks on 32-bit, 8k stacks on 64-bit
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 26 May 2005 23:23:28 -0500
Cc: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <200505261518.56673.kewley@gps.caltech.edu>
References: <200505252241.26815.kewley@gps.caltech.edu> <429608A2.8060702@sgi.com> <200505261518.56673.kewley@gps.caltech.edu>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Macintosh/20050317)
David Kewley wrote:
On Thursday 26 May 2005 10:34, Eric Sandeen wrote:

If you just run local xfs without stacking other drivers above/below
it in the IO chain, you'll be less likely to hit a problem.


Thanks Eric. Unfortunately, my typical application has a stack like this:

3w-9xxx (JBOD since hw RAID5 is extremely slow in my hands)
md (RAID 6)
lvm2
xfs
nfs

What's your educated guess about the likelihood of hitting problems with this stack, assuming ~10 busy nfs clients?

on ia32 you're doomed. on x86_64 I'd test it. :)

-Eric


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>