| To: | Bub Thomas <thomas.bub@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Every new file goes into a new ag |
| From: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 11 May 2005 10:15:03 -0500 |
| Cc: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, Braehler Uwe <uwe.braehler@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Lindenkreuz Morris <morris.lindenkreuz@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Waldschmidt Stefan <stefan.waldschmidt@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <B79FAF8BB536314E859EA1963CFFD22237B57F@wdtssmail01.eu.thmulti.com> |
| References: | <B79FAF8BB536314E859EA1963CFFD22237B57F@wdtssmail01.eu.thmulti.com> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041206) |
|
If you have a "rotorstep" systune in your xfs codebase you might play
with that; otherwise try making the size of your inode bigger (at mkfs
time) so that you don't get into inode32 mode. (or, if you're on a
64-bit machine, mount with the "inode64" option to make 64-bit inodes). for large filesystems, xfs must ensure that inode numbers don't go over 32 bits. To do that, inodes are allocated in the lower part of the fileysstem, and files are allocated round-robin through the AGs. rotorstep changes that round-robin behavior to switch to a new AG every (X) new files, instead of every (1) new file. If you can get out of inode32 mode by either mounting with 64-bit inodes on a 64-bit machine, or making the inode size larger (affects the inode numbering scheme) then files created in a single directory will generally be allocated in the same AG. -Eric Bub Thomas wrote: Hi there, |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Every new file goes into a new ag, Bub Thomas |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: XFS on 2.4 Tib raid, Eric Sandeen |
| Previous by Thread: | Every new file goes into a new ag, Bub Thomas |
| Next by Thread: | RE: Every new file goes into a new ag, Bub Thomas |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |