| To: | "Niv Sardi" <xaiki@xxxxxxx>, "David Chinner" <dgc@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Default mount options (that suck less). |
| From: | nscott@xxxxxxxxxx |
| Date: | Mon, 29 Oct 2007 21:44:01 +1100 (EST) |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Importance: | Normal |
| In-reply-to: | <20071029085502.GI995458@sgi.com> |
| References: | <20071029075657.GA84369978@melbourne.sgi.com> <20071029085502.GI995458@sgi.com> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | SquirrelMail/1.4.8-4.el4.centos |
> On Mon, Oct 29, 2007 at 06:56:57PM +1100, Niv Sardi wrote: >> Hello, >> >> XFS's default mount options are in most cases sub-optimal, we should try > > Mkfs options ;) > >> to have more sensible defaults, so far I'm following some quick >> dave-powered >> recomendations: >> >> - version 2 logs >> - attr2 >> - lazy superblock counters >> - less allocation groups for single disk configs > Version 2 inodes should always be created by default (there are both userspace and kernel changes required for that). cheers. -- Nathan |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Crash with XFS on top of DRBD (DRBD 8.0.6 svn / Kernel 2.6.22), Laurent Caron |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Default mount options (that suck less)., Eric Sandeen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Default mount options (that suck less)., David Chinner |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Default mount options (that suck less)., Eric Sandeen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |