xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Major XFS problems...

To: Anders Saaby <as@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Major XFS problems...
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 08 Sep 2004 13:59:42 -0500
Cc: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <chnfn7$3t9$1@harrier.cohaesio.com>
References: <20040908133954.GB390@unthought.net> <413F1C6E.9040009@sgi.com> <20040908150713.GC390@unthought.net> <413F3A31.8070906@sgi.com> <chnfn7$3t9$1@harrier.cohaesio.com>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.3 (X11/20040803)
Anders Saaby wrote:

Which slab cache(s) are growing... This is probably a "normal"
side-effect of iterating over millions of inodes.


Check http://lkml.org/lkml/2004/8/24/53 - That explains what we are seeing.

> > 03:00: 06:00: > > xfs_chashlist 91297 xfs_chashlist 151994 > > xfs_inode 243791 xfs_inode 586780 > > linvfs_icache 243791 linvfs_icache 586807 > > dentry_cache 196033 dentry_cache 430609

So your dentry cache doubled, and associated xfs data structures doubled along with it. This is not an xfs bug; xfs can't tear down it's inodes if dentries have them referenced...

I thought there were cache shrinkers in 2.6 that would shake out dentries when memory got low, though...

-Eric


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>