| To: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Recover a XFS on raid -1 (linear) when one disk is broken |
| From: | Jan Banan <b@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 31 Jul 2004 09:35:31 +0200 |
| In-reply-to: | <20040731054924.GA4748@taniwha.stupidest.org> |
| References: | <40F6DBC1.6050909@grabbarna.nu> <20040715205910.GA9948@taniwha.stupidest.org> <40F9321C.7060403@grabbarna.nu> <20040717203943.GL20260@plato.local.lan> <410ADC0A.6060100@grabbarna.nu> <20040731054924.GA4748@taniwha.stupidest.org> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040116 |
yes, but conv=noerror should also skip over the bad sector too. didThe computer was "dead" after those messages in /var/log/messages and it didn't answer "ping" and the connected monitor screen was black so I suppose the kernel was not working any longer. So I then rebooted the computer the hard way with the reset-button. also, did you get the SMART values from the bad disk? i still think it's worth forcing a realloction and using the existing disk if it's not *that* bad Where do I find those SMART values? (sorry for being stupid) Thanks, Jan |
| Previous by Date: | Re: building xfsprogs (CVS): mmap.c:627: `MADV_NORMAL' undeclared, Bernhard Erdmann |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Recover a XFS on raid -1 (linear) when one disk is broken, Chris Wedgwood |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Recover a XFS on raid -1 (linear) when one disk is broken, Chris Wedgwood |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Recover a XFS on raid -1 (linear) when one disk is broken, Chris Wedgwood |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |