| Subject: | Re: Recover a XFS on raid -1 (linear) when one disk is broken |
|---|---|
| From: | Jan Banan <b@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 31 Jul 2004 01:38:50 +0200 |
| Cc: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20040717203943.GL20260@plato.local.lan> |
| References: | <40F6DBC1.6050909@grabbarna.nu> <20040715205910.GA9948@taniwha.stupidest.org> <40F9321C.7060403@grabbarna.nu> <20040717203943.GL20260@plato.local.lan> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040116 |
I have tried this two times now and after about four hours the computer crashes with this in /var/log/messages :dd if=/dev/broken of=/dev/new bs=512 conv=sync,noerror [...] Jul 30 20:46:23 d kernel: hdh: dma_intr: status=0x51 { DriveReady SeekComplete Error } Jul 30 20:46:23 d kernel: hdh: dma_intr: error=0x01 { AddrMarkNotFound }, LBAsect=28117754, high=1, low=11340538, sector=28117718 Jul 30 20:46:23 d kernel: hdg: DMA disabled Jul 30 20:46:23 d kernel: hdh: DMA disabled Jul 30 20:46:23 d kernel: PDC202XX: Secondary channel reset. Jul 30 20:46:23 d kernel: ide3: reset: success Second time the last sector mentioned was 28117656. Maybe I should try to skip over that and start right after that sector? If I read the man-page of "dd" right I should add something like "seek=28117718 skip=28117718" to that command-line to perform that. Am I correct? What you think? Thanks alot for your input, Jan |
| Previous by Date: | [Bug 351] XFS internal error xlog_clear_stale_blocks, bugzilla-daemon |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Recover a XFS on raid -1 (linear) when one disk is broken, Ethan Benson |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Recover a XFS on raid -1 (linear) when one disk is broken, Ethan Benson |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Recover a XFS on raid -1 (linear) when one disk is broken, Chris Wedgwood |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |