| To: | Anthony Biacco <ABiacco@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: mount: Function not implemented? |
| From: | Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 19 Jul 2004 17:39:58 -0500 |
| Cc: | Chris Wedgwood <cw@xxxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <74918D8CA17F7C418753F01078F10B6BD08541@bill.corporate.quris.com> |
| References: | <74918D8CA17F7C418753F01078F10B6BD08541@bill.corporate.quris.com> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.1 (X11/20040626) |
Anthony Biacco wrote:
ok, elaborate please. It's a valid parameter, yes? From what I understand XFS can do up to 64k blocksizes. Am I mistaken?
Steve |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | RE: mount: Function not implemented?, Anthony Biacco |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: mount: Function not implemented?, Anthony Biacco |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: mount: Function not implemented?, Anthony Biacco |
| Next by Thread: | RE: mount: Function not implemented?, Anthony Biacco |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |