| To: | campbell@xxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: xfs on raid questions |
| From: | Seth Mos <seth.mos@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 18 Jun 2004 11:57:18 +0200 |
| In-reply-to: | <20040617184510.GB4309@helium.inexs.com> |
| References: | <20040617152353.GB2511@helium.inexs.com> <40D1D87D.9030208@xfs.org> <20040617184510.GB4309@helium.inexs.com> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7 (Windows/20040616) |
Chuck Campbell wrote:
On Thu, Jun 17, 2004 at 12:44:29PM -0500, Steve Lord wrote: Note that ia32 has a 2TB blockdevice limit in 2.4. And even 1TB in RHEL 3, wonky things start happening if it's larger. 2.6 can go larger, but only with a 64bit box. eg. alpha, itanium, amd64. So if you are going to connect it to a linux server your best bet is something other then your average intel box. You could split your raid in multiple raid luns to get around this. If you are going to run on a SGI Altix I don't think you'll have a problem, but Steve knows best. Cheers Seth |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: CVS merge/update problem?, Jason White |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: xfs on raid questions, Joshua Baker-LePain |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: xfs on raid questions, Chuck Campbell |
| Next by Thread: | Re: xfs on raid questions, Joshua Baker-LePain |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |