xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: 2.4.25 & xfs & ide write barriers

To: Michael Lampe <Michael.Lampe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: 2.4.25 & xfs & ide write barriers
From: Jeremy Jackson <jerj@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2004 10:05:05 -0500
Cc: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
References: <403E0A7A.3040505@iwr.uni-heidelberg.de> <20040229221924.GA731@frodo> <4043355E.9080208@iwr.uni-heidelberg.de>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020623 Debian/1.0.0-0.woody.1
Michael Lampe wrote:

Is this all I need (I already have applied the ide write barrier patch)
to safely use disk write back caching?



(which IDE write barrier patch is that, out of curiousity?)


The one that SuSE ships with their latest kernel. Due to Jens Axboe, I think. (Attached.)

This stuff is untested by anyone here at SGI, so YMMV.  It is
also not going to work in the presence of unwritten extents
(which were implemented after this change), some additional
code would be needed there.


Pity, that. Beeing forced to disable write caching is major performance killer.

-Michael

I think write back caching is a lame IDE performance hack. SCSI disks use TCQ to achieve write performance without compromising data integrity. (XFS guys - Linux does this, right?) I wonder if it would be more productive to pursue the IDE-TCQ stuff that's coming down the pipe.


Regards,

Jeremy Jackson


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>