xfs
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: Performance question

from [Seth Mos] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: Joshua Baker-LePain <jlb17@xxxxxxxx>, Linux xfs mailing list <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Performance question
From: Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 20:03:18 +0100
In-reply-to: <4.3.2.7.2.20040218193615.035c24c8@pop.xs4all.nl>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0402181131210.25541@chaos.egr.duke.edu>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
At 19:41 18-2-2004 +0100, Seth Mos wrote:
At 12:57 18-2-2004 -0500, Joshua Baker-LePain wrote:
Perhaps creating the filessystem with a larger inode size like 512. You could also use version logs instead of version which mostly helped software raid 5 although this might help hardware as well. 

Version 2 logs that is.

Cheers

--
Seth
I don't make sense, I don't pretend to either. Questions?


[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: Performance question, Christian Guggenberger
Next by Date:  xfs_repair -n -f - Dangerous?, Joshua Schmidlkofer
Previous by Thread:  Re: Performance question, Christian Guggenberger
Next by Thread:  Re: Performance question, Joshua Baker-LePain
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]