xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: XFS patch for 2.4.9-e.10.10summit

To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Vangel Bojaxhi <vbojaxhi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: XFS patch for 2.4.9-e.10.10summit
From: Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2003 17:35:24 +0100
Cc: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, al Richings <ARichings@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20030211160407.A14637@infradead.org>
References: <5.1.0.14.2.20030211083929.00ae8830@wgmail1.houston.nam.slb.com> <5.1.0.14.2.20030211083929.00ae8830@wgmail1.houston.nam.slb.com>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
At 16:04 11-2-2003 +0000, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 08:47:10AM -0600, Vangel Bojaxhi wrote:
> To whom it may concern:
>
> I am investigating if the  XFS can be implemented in a IBM i386 8 way SMP
> machine, running Red Hat Advanced Serever Kernel
> Version  2.4.9-e.10.10summit. Unfortunately the latest patch I could find
> in your site http://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs/.. is the
> "xfs-1.1-PR2-2.4.18-all.patch.bz2" ,  which is for 2.4.18 kernel.

It's basically not possible to backport the current XFS code to a pre-2.4.11
kernel, I'd suggest you use a newer kernel anyway.  Anyway, where is
that kernel rpm downloadable?  The newest kernel on RH's ftp site
is 2.4.9-10.

The Advanced server product still uses a 2.4.9 based kernel which is heavily modified. I don't think it is worth the trouble to make it patch and work.


The sources for AS are available on the ftp site somewhere IIRC but you have to pay $800 anually for the product itself.

So I am afraid that XFS in RHAS is a no-go and it would also void any support that you just paid for.

Cheers

--
Seth
It might just be your lucky day, if you only knew.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>