| To: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Vangel Bojaxhi <vbojaxhi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: XFS patch for 2.4.9-e.10.10summit |
| From: | Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 11 Feb 2003 17:35:24 +0100 |
| Cc: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, al Richings <ARichings@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <20030211160407.A14637@infradead.org> |
| References: | <5.1.0.14.2.20030211083929.00ae8830@wgmail1.houston.nam.slb.com> <5.1.0.14.2.20030211083929.00ae8830@wgmail1.houston.nam.slb.com> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
At 16:04 11-2-2003 +0000, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 08:47:10AM -0600, Vangel Bojaxhi wrote: > To whom it may concern: > > I am investigating if the XFS can be implemented in a IBM i386 8 way SMP > machine, running Red Hat Advanced Serever Kernel > Version 2.4.9-e.10.10summit. Unfortunately the latest patch I could find > in your site http://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs/.. is the > "xfs-1.1-PR2-2.4.18-all.patch.bz2" , which is for 2.4.18 kernel. The Advanced server product still uses a 2.4.9 based kernel which is heavily modified. I don't think it is worth the trouble to make it patch and work. The sources for AS are available on the ftp site somewhere IIRC but you have to pay $800 anually for the product itself. So I am afraid that XFS in RHAS is a no-go and it would also void any support that you just paid for. Cheers -- Seth It might just be your lucky day, if you only knew. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | TAKE - fix a comment typo, Christoph Hellwig |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: XFS patch for 2.4.9-e.10.10summit, Ray Muno |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: XFS patch for 2.4.9-e.10.10summit, Christoph Hellwig |
| Next by Thread: | Re: XFS patch for 2.4.9-e.10.10summit, Ray Muno |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |