xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: xfs vs. jfs results: why?

To: "LA Walsh" <law@xxxxxxxxx>, <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: xfs vs. jfs results: why?
From: Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2003 10:35:36 +0100
In-reply-to: <000001c2c032$e4edc240$1403a8c0@sc.tlinx.org>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
At 19:20 19-1-2003 -0800, LA Walsh wrote:
CONCLUSION:
We are not able to reproduce the excellent numbers described at:
http://home.fnal.gov/~yocum/storageServerTechnicalNote.html
It appears that the best performance for read-orientated and mixed
workloads is obtained with JFS, for write-orientated XFS.
---
From page: http://pcbunn.cacr.caltech.edu/gae/3ware_raid_tests.htm

Since you are using 2.4.19. Did you compile this kernel with HIGMEM and HIGHMEM IO?


There have been some performance problems in 2.4.19 if you did not have HIGHMEM IO turned on.

Can you check this please?

Cheers

--
Seth
It might just be your lucky day, if you only knew.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>