| To: | Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk <roy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, XFS Mailing list <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Q: Filesystem block sizes available? |
| From: | Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 13 Nov 2001 15:55:59 +0100 |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.30.0111131537380.1009-100000@mustard.heime.net> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
At 15:41 13-11-2001 +0100, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote:
Hi
I've seen the note 'Filesystem block size' on the features list, and it says it's limited to the page size on the given architecture (eg .4k on ia64). The fs blocksize has not much to do with the amount it writes in one go. XFS uses delayed allocation so it will probably write a lot of data at once anyways. If you can give some Use software raid 0 over multiple 15K RPM scsi disks or go fiber and make a raid 0 out of that. You can even mix them, for optimal effect use disks that are the same size. more spindles == higher speed. Make sure to use multiple controllers to spread the bus activity. XFS also has some builtin heuristics in mkfs.xfs that will detect the striping and make some reasonable assumptions on how to optimize the fs layout. Cheers -- Seth Every program has two purposes one for which it was written and another for which it wasn't I use the last kind. |
| Previous by Date: | Re: Harddrive error and XFS corruption, Seth Mos |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Harddrive error and XFS corruption, Simon Matter |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Q: Filesystem block sizes available?, Ingo Molnar |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Q: Filesystem block sizes available?, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |