| To: | Mike Burger <mburger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: fsck equivalent? |
| From: | Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 08 Sep 2001 00:23:06 +0200 |
| Cc: | <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.33.0109071705190.17564-100000@linux.compucomis. net> |
| References: | <Pine.LNX.4.33.0109071536460.16059-100000@linux.compucomis.net> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
At 17:06 7-9-2001 -0400, Mike Burger wrote:
Well, the good news is that I didn't lose the /var filesystem, this time...but I did lose the database that I had just created (no data in it, though, so it works out ok. <G>). If you see this often can you then specify sopme details like what compiler you used ig you compiled your own or what hardware you are on. xfs_repair did help, though.
Cheers -- Seth Every program has two purposes one for which it was written and another for which it wasn't I use the last kind. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: fsck equivalent?, Mike Burger |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Problems with 2.4.5 + XFS 1.0.1 + qlogicfc driver, Poul Petersen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: fsck equivalent?, Mike Burger |
| Next by Thread: | Problems with 2.4.5 + XFS 1.0.1 + qlogicfc driver, Poul Petersen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |