xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OT] XFS and FreeBSD?

To: Federico Sevilla III <jijo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Linux XFS Mailing List <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [OT] XFS and FreeBSD?
From: Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 11:38:52 +0200
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0107121718480.376-100000@kalapati.leathercol lection.local>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
At 17:21 12-7-2001 +0800, Federico Sevilla III wrote:
Hi everyone,

I hope this does not cause any major trouble. I am wondering if there is
any effort to get XFS working on FreeBSD complete with EAs and ACLs. I do
not know what the state of the filesystem support of FreeBSD is, but the
last I've read looks like it's still UFS with soft updates. I also
personally wonder why SGI decided to port XFS to Linux and not to the
BSDs. I have never used any BSD (I use Linux actually) but this just makes
me curious. I've heard the BSDs are also very good, but maybe someone can
enlighten me off-list about this.

The biggest concern of most BSD people is that XFS would need to be licensed under the BSD license, Unfortunately the people at SGI had a hard enough time to convince them to use the GPL license as it is. I don't think they will switch licenses because it takes huge efforts to do so.


it would be possible to use the GPL code in BSDs but you would probably need a fs layer interface to seperate the two. This makes it possible to use XFS as a GPL piece of code without needing to change the license. But I might be wrong though, I am not really at home in the BSD side of the world.

However due to the nature of XFS and it's interactivity with the VM this would be a huge effort to port to BSD. It would take a lot of time to make it work.

I might forget something, but you can look in the mailing list archives for a previous BSD discussion.

Cheers

--
Seth
Every program has two purposes one for which
it was written and another for which it wasn't
I use the last kind.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>