| To: | Simon Matter <simon.matter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Steve Wolfe <nw@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: XFS for Linux 1.0.1 Released |
| From: | Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 12 Jul 2001 08:58:24 +0200 |
| Cc: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <3B4D479D.20EBD665@ch.sauter-bc.com> |
| References: | <200107102103.f6AL3am18531@jen.americas.sgi.com> <20010711105428.A21601@ii.uib.no> <3B4C18A3.185769CD@idcomm.com> <3B4C6BFF.5939F32D@sgi.com> <3B4CBA71.D1D4E781@idcomm.com> <000f01c10a4a$413a9320$50824e40@iboats.com> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
At 08:45 12-7-2001 +0200, Simon Matter wrote: I like the RH kernels, because of all the features they include. And I never got bad network throughput with them. Do you have Gigabit Ethernet where you have slow throughput? I have lots of servers here with all kind of different NIC's and I have never had a speed problem on the network. The only problem I remember was when sombody changed the switch config from autosensing/autoselect to fixed 100mb/FD. This has just killed throughput on several NIC's. Sometimes you can't trust autosensing either. But by default the NIC and switch seem to agree about what speed they want to talk. The one exception I have encountered is with the Xircom Cardbus cards. There are about 15 different variants of it and they all have their own bugs and problems. eg. it doesn't work untill you put it into promiscious mode. Cheers -- Seth Every program has two purposes one for which it was written and another for which it wasn't I use the last kind. |
| Previous by Date: | Re: XFS ACL problem on PPC, thomas graichen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: XFS for Linux 1.0.1 Released, Keith Owens |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: XFS for Linux 1.0.1 Released, Simon Matter |
| Next by Thread: | Re: XFS for Linux 1.0.1 Released, Keith Owens |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |