xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: XFS for Linux 1.0.1 Released

To: ries@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: XFS for Linux 1.0.1 Released
From: Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2001 13:56:47 +0200
In-reply-to: <3B4C5230.17148.81D3D9@localhost>
References: <4.3.2.7.2.20010711124947.032a2cb0@pop.xs4all.nl> <3B4C427F.7702.448435@localhost>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
At 13:18 11-7-2001 +0200, Ries van Twisk wrote:
O>Currently it's runing for 14 day's now without problems.
>
> The problem is not really with the raid hardware itself but the driver.
> When they resolve that we will use it again. There have been reports of
> corruption under high load. See http://domsch.com/linux/
Th only problem with data curruption are the access database file but that is
really a Samba problem. So far no problem found. But my system runs under
low loads about 25 Samba users on a 10Mb network.

That is a low load.

> >I also applied the XFS patch to the Linux 2.4.5 kernel.
> >It all compiles fine now.
>
> Always make sure to use kgcc for production systems.
Never know that there was a kgcc version! I just use gcc version 2.95.2.

What distribution is this? If it is debian or SuSE I recomend upgrading your compiler to at least 2.95.3 or 4.
You can have hung processes or file system corruption when using the older compiler. kgcc is actually a redhat-ism. But it is just gcc 2.91-66 or egcs 1.1.2. If you can get that you are safe.


> >It's not tested on my PE 2400 server yet but the kernel itself works great on
> >a test IDE systeem.
>
> It should work fine, we have two 2450 servers running at work but with a
> AMI megaraid. I got tired of each patching my kernel for every new version
> with the aacraid patch.
I just upgraded it to 2.4.5 and want to install xfs on it as soon as Samba
compiles fine with acl from xfs. That I'll leave it alone again.
>
> >I'm currently buzy to compiling Samba aswell but I still have some problems
> >with ACL.
>
> 2.2.1 I presume? I did download it but I will have to see of it compiles
> under NCR Unix first.
Yes a 2.2.1 version. But it does not compile with acl support :-(


Samba expect the files in sys/ and not in acl/ and the header file are different.

Yes these files have moved. You may be able to specify the location with a --with-acl=/usr/include/acl or something like that. If not, you will have to walk through the code to see where the configure script is looking and change that. I guess the samba folks were probably caught off guard.


Cheers

--
Seth
Every program has two purposes one for which
it was written and another for which it wasn't
I use the last kind.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>