| To: | ries@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, Jan-Frode Myklebust <janfrode@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: XFS for Linux 1.0.1 Released |
| From: | Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 11 Jul 2001 12:56:17 +0200 |
| In-reply-to: | <3B4C427F.7702.448435@localhost> |
| References: | <20010711105428.A21601@ii.uib.no> <200107102103.f6AL3am18531@jen.americas.sgi.com> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
At 12:11 11-7-2001 +0200, Ries van Twisk wrote:
I have paches for the raid controllers. Currently it's runing for 14 day's now without problems. The problem is not really with the raid hardware itself but the driver. When they resolve that we will use it again. There have been reports of corruption under high load. See http://domsch.com/linux/ I also applied the XFS patch to the Linux 2.4.5 kernel. It all compiles fine now.
It's not tested on my PE 2400 server yet but the kernel itself works great on a test IDE systeem. It should work fine, we have two 2450 servers running at work but with a AMI megaraid. I got tired of each patching my kernel for every new version with the aacraid patch. I'm currently buzy to compiling Samba aswell but I still have some problems with ACL. 2.2.1 I presume? I did download it but I will have to see of it compiles under NCR Unix first. Cheers -- Seth Every program has two purposes one for which it was written and another for which it wasn't I use the last kind. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: XFS for Linux 1.0.1 Released, Ries van Twisk |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: XFS for Linux 1.0.1 Released, Ries van Twisk |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: XFS for Linux 1.0.1 Released, Ries van Twisk |
| Next by Thread: | Re: XFS for Linux 1.0.1 Released, Ries van Twisk |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |