xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Help... Everything moved to lost&found

To: Juha Saarinen <juha@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Help... Everything moved to lost&found
From: Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2001 11:25:23 +0200
Cc: "JHamilton@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <JHamilton@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0107092102480.326-100000@vimfuego.saarinen.o rg>
References: <4.3.2.7.2.20010709105253.02ac25e8@pop.xs4all.nl>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
At 21:04 9-7-2001 +1200, Juha Saarinen wrote:
On Mon, 9 Jul 2001, Seth Mos wrote:

> If you compiled it yourself I hope you did that using kgcc on redhat systems.
> gcc-2.96-whatever is still not safe for data integrity.


Not sure -- my system's been OK with gcc 2.96-88 from Red Hat Rawhide. The
stock RH gcc 2.96-85 isn't happy with XFS though.

But in general XFS does not like 2.96 and you should avoid it for your critical data. Feel free to use it on your test machines but avoid it for production machines.


--
Seth
Every program has two purposes one for which
it was written and another for which it wasn't
I use the last kind.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>