xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: RedHat 7.1 (XFS 1.0) + OpenOffice 627 or 625

To: daedalus@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, lloy0076@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: RedHat 7.1 (XFS 1.0) + OpenOffice 627 or 625
From: Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 13:48:30 +0200
In-reply-to: <41qgjt8ksvoin7ojgb160jav5dokgbbe64@4ax.com>
References: <3B3732C3.76E797B0@rebel.net.au> <3B3732C3.76E797B0@rebel.net.au>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
At 13:27 26-6-2001 +0200, daedalus@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
On Mon, 25 Jun 2001 22:16:59 +0930, David Lloyd
<lloy0076@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>Has anyone noticed whether OpenOffice runs extraordinarily slowly under
>that combination? It's not a fast program by all means, but it seems to
>have really slowed down since I installed RH 7.1/XFS by SGI et al...
>
>DSL

It may be a bare hd speed difference?
I mean the kernels may have different hw support
for example I have noticed that sometimes kernels are patched with
code from http://www.linux-ide.org
I rember I got 3.90 MB/s with 2.2.19, when I got the patch and built
the via82Cxxxx support I reached 21 MB/s !!!
I have never reached such performance on the same hw even using the
2.4.5 patch for the vanilla tree: the best I could get is 10 MB/s


Where do I find OpenOffice? I will try it for you.

Although my home system is probably a bit on the new side to really compare.
I have a 1.4GHz Athlon with 256MB ram and a 60GB IDE disk that can read up to 35MB/s. I can always try on my notebook. That one is mostly 1.0.


But I can at least check. I also noticed that the system feels slower with the mostly modular 1.0 kernel. I recompiled it with most things like IDE and scsi compiled in which "felt" faster.

Cheers
--
Seth
Every program has two purposes one for which
it was written and another for which it wasn't
I use the last kind.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>