xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: XFS CVS server seems to be down

To: "P.A.M. van Dam (Pascal)" <tormentor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: XFS CVS server seems to be down
From: Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 28 May 2001 09:45:42 +0200
Cc: "P.A.M. van Dam (Pascal)" <tormentor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20010527164302.A5230@ladystrange.bluehorizon.nl>
References: <3B10A64B.E85EA958@sgi.com> <20010526165417.A12668@ladystrange.bluehorizon.nl> <3B10A64B.E85EA958@sgi.com>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
At 16:43 27-5-2001 +0200, P.A.M. van Dam (Pascal) wrote:
On Sun, May 27, 2001 at 02:01:31AM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> "P.A.M. van Dam (Pascal)" wrote:
>
> > I'm probably not the first one who notices it, but I'm unable tot reach the
> > CVS server. The server responds with a connection refused message.
>
> works for me here (outside SGI network)...
>
> They rearranged some IPs earlier today, maybe you still have an old IP
> cached? oss.sgi.com is 216.32.174.27 for me.


Eric,

The IP I get resolved is indeed the old one, probably the propagation further
downstream here doesn't work. But, using 216.32.174.27 also doesn't work.

Best regards,

Pascal

When routing over the xs4all.nl network but using our company DNS server I get the following IP's.
Note that the linux-xfs.sgi.com machine times out.


[seth@lsautom seth]$ ping -c1 oss.sgi.com
PING oss.sgi.com (216.32.174.190) from 10.0.1.227 : 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from oss.sgi.com (216.32.174.190): icmp_seq=0 ttl=241 time=171.692 msec


--- oss.sgi.com ping statistics ---
1 packets transmitted, 1 packets received, 0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 171.692/171.692/171.692/0.000 ms
[seth@lsautom seth]$ ping -c1 linux-xfs.sgi.com
PING linux-xfs.sgi.com (216.32.174.30) from 10.0.1.227 : 56(84) bytes of data.

--- linux-xfs.sgi.com ping statistics ---
1 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100% packet loss
[seth@lsautom seth]$

So the linux-xfs.sgi.com machine is now unreachable or was it part of a transplant?

Cheers

--
Seth
Every program has two purposes one for which
it was written and another for which it wasn't
I use the last kind.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>