| To: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: 1.0 Installer |
| From: | Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 24 May 2001 22:19:39 +0200 |
| Cc: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <3B0D5DEE.54EC5532@sgi.com> |
| References: | <4.3.2.7.2.20010524204643.039126c0@pop.xs4all.nl> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
At 14:15 24-5-2001 -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
Hm, we didn't anticipate this scenario. :) FWIW, the same thing happens under ext2, if it detects that a filesystem was not cleanly unmounted, the install won't continue.
>> Just checking if anyone else has seen this behaviour. > Does anyone know if this also happens when the ext2 fs is dirty or not? Indeed, it does ask you this. First try got me a sig11 second try gave me the warning box that there is a unchecked fs (probably boot which is ext2) and asks me to fix it first. I don't know what is wrong with the box or the CD. it keeps barfing with sig11 and oopses. I don't get it. If I boot the selfcompiled kernel (2.4.2 based but then from CVS instead of the redhat kernel it doesn't fall over. Not even under serious load. FYI it's a P1 233mmx with 64MB ram and a 20GB IDE disk. I can send you the dmesg if you are interested. Bye -- Seth Every program has two purposes one for which it was written and another for which it wasn't I use the last kind. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: 1.0 Installer, Mike Burger |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | CVS Recompile ala RH 7.1 ..., Michael Sowka |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: 1.0 Installer, Eric Sandeen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: 1.0 Installer, Seth Mos |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |