| To: | Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: direct-IO writes strange behavior |
| From: | Alberto Nava <beto@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 28 Nov 2003 17:14:09 -0800 |
| Cc: | Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <3FC78FA4.2090000@kasenna.com> |
| References: | <3FBECF7E.6010509@kasenna.com> <3FBFEF6A.3000609@kasenna.com> <20031127004420.77f31a9c.akpm@osdl.org> <3FC78FA4.2090000@kasenna.com> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 |
Alberto Nava wrote:
I tried this with the 2.6.0-test11 and it works fine. The 512k writes to a new file are propagaded all the way to the drives. It work without having to use '-d unwritten' or preallocation. Here is a snip of the proc file I used to verify it. (8,16)@85886 b=f24f0d80 r=ef9c49b0 s=140288(size=524288) prio=0 rw 1 (8,32)@85886 b=ef891680 r=ef9c47b8 s=140288(size=524288) prio=0 rw 1 (8,48)@85895 b=ef891680 r=ef9c49b0 s=140288(size=524288) prio=0 rw 1 (8,64)@85895 b=f24f0d80 r=ef9c47b8 s=140288(size=524288) prio=0 rw 1 (8,80)@85903 b=ef891680 r=ef9c47b8 s=140288(size=524288) prio=0 rw 1
Thanks a lot for your help beto |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Linux 2.4.22 XFS 1.3.1 reservation ran out, Nathan Scott |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: direct-IO writes strange behavior, Nathan Scott |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: direct-IO writes strange behavior, Alberto Nava |
| Next by Thread: | Re: direct-IO writes strange behavior, Nathan Scott |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |