xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: XFS as a module for RH AS or ES

To: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: XFS as a module for RH AS or ES
From: Nicholas Wourms <nwourms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2003 10:16:23 -0400
References: <1056471969.2919.14.camel@portageek.digitalroadkill.net> <4.3.2.7.2.20030625105031.039361b0@pop.xs4all.nl>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win 9x 4.90; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20030208 MultiZilla/v1.1.20
Seth Mos wrote:
[SNIP]
We bought the basic ES product for $350 only to find that it doesn't support the raid controller in the new server it is supposed to be installed on. Yay. Red Hat says that the machine is not listed in their hardware compatability list and as such will not do anything with the support call. To make it even sillier, the driver for the raid controller in question is in the rpm but not available during installer time... aaarrrgh.

Hi Seth,

I spoke with Rik van Riel the other day regarding an enterprise kernel beta I found on rawhide and he said the 2.4.2{0|1} version of the Red Hat enteprise kernel should be going into "official" freeze any day now. Based on that, he predicts that a formal release of that kernel should happen soon (mid July?) (I'm assuming a new version of the AS/ES product will be released as well). Unfortunately, while it uses the more current -rc-ac patchset (which had xfs support), apparently they stripped the xfs bits from it. Still, it should be better then screwing around with 2.4.9 :-). Perhaps you might want to e-mail him and express interest in helping to get xfs support into anaconda (since xfs is pretty popular in the enterprise).

Cheers,
Nicholas



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>