Re: filesystem size difference ? ;-)

To:	linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject:	Re: filesystem size difference ? ;-)
From:	Juri Haberland <juri@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Wed, 23 Apr 2003 17:52:28 +0200
In-reply-to:	<000f01c309ae$38170ca0$141ea8c0@dm>
Organization:	totally unorganized
References:	<000f01c309ae$38170ca0$141ea8c0@dm>
Sender:	linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20021130

Dmitry Melekhov wrote:

> And if I try to copy info to it it becomes full:
> Any ideas?

Are there any symbolic links in the old filesystem that might not get
copied as links but as the files that they point to?

Please describe the exact copy command.

Cheers,
Juri

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
filesystem size difference ? ;-), Dmitry Melekhov Re: filesystem size difference ? ;-), Eric Sandeen Re: filesystem size difference ? ;-), Dmitry Melekhov Re: filesystem size difference ? ;-), Danny Cox Re: filesystem size difference ? ;-), Dmitry Melekhov Re: filesystem size difference ? ;-), Jan Derfinak Re: filesystem size difference ? ;-), Dmitry Melekhov Re: filesystem size difference ? ;-), Jan Derfinak Re: filesystem size difference ? ;-), Juri Haberland <= Re: filesystem size difference ? ;-), Nathan Straz Re: filesystem size difference ? ;-), Dmitry Melekhov Re: filesystem size difference ? ;-), Dmitry Melekhov re[2]: filesystem size difference ? ;-), Greg Freemyer re[2]: filesystem size difference ? ;-), Jan Derfinak

Previous by Date:	RE: Redhat 9 - grub wont boot with XFS root fs after migration, Gareth Blades
Next by Date:	Re: filesystem size difference ? ;-), Dmitry Melekhov
Previous by Thread:	Re: filesystem size difference ? ;-), Jan Derfinak
Next by Thread:	Re: filesystem size difference ? ;-), Nathan Straz
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]