| To: | Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: A more comprehensive backup inventory? [WAS: re[2]: Hopefullysimple xfsrestore question] |
| From: | Bernhard Erdmann <be@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 30 Aug 2002 00:51:05 +0200 |
| Cc: | Greg Freemyer <freemyer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| References: | <20020816183147.CIZE23992.imf00bis.bellsouth.net@TAZ2> <1029526038.23167.4.camel@jen.americas.sgi.com> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Steve Lord wrote: [...] > Looks like the inventory files are not a complete listing of what is in > various dumps, there is no fast way to work out which dump you need to > restore from at the XFS level. Amanda may offer this type of facility, > I really do not know. Yes, Amanda keeps an inventory of all the filenames backed up. Basically, it backs up a filesystem by dump and doubles the data stream. One stream is sent over the network to a "holding disk" from which it is dd'ed to tape and the other stream is fed to restore -t. Its output is transferred with a second TCP connection and stored in a plain (gzipped) textfile. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | TAKE - fix log recovery of unlinked inodes, Steve Lord |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | snapshot regression test try 2, Greg Freemyer |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: A more comprehensive backup inventory? [WAS: re[2]: Hopefully simple xfsrestore question], Steve Lord |
| Next by Thread: | Re: A more comprehensive backup inventory? [WAS: re[2]: Hopefully simple xfsrestore question], Matteo Centonza |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |