| To: | "Blizbor (IMA)" <tb670725@xxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: XFS and net devices, any pros or cons ? |
| From: | Simon Matter <simon.matter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 16 Aug 2002 13:07:27 +0200 |
| >received: | from mobile.sauter-bc.com (unknown [10.1.6.21]) by basel1.sauter-bc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2644E57306; Fri, 16 Aug 2002 13:07:28 +0200 (CEST) |
| Cc: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Organization: | Sauter AG, Basel |
| References: | <20020814171123.FZMF1197.imf05bis.bellsouth.net@TAZ2> <1029345349.15708.98.camel@jen.americas.sgi.com> <3D5B5696.3FDFD3B6@ch.sauter-bc.com> <3D5CD102.804@ima.pl> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
"Blizbor (IMA)" schrieb: > > Simon Matter wrote: > > > > > If I'm not completely wrong here drbd is similar to nbd, isn't it. > > Long time ago I have successfully built a software RAID5 over three > > server using nbd, of course running XFS as filesystem. > > How many crashes it was survived ? > (Probably you were crashing them for tests, arent so ?) I really don't remember what I tested. The only thing I'm sure is that it has worked. Simon > > Regards, > Blizbor |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: umount in XFS is broken, Ethan Benson |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | TAKE - merge up to 2.5.31, Steve Lord |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: XFS and net devices, any pros or cons ?, Blizbor (IMA) |
| Next by Thread: | Re: XFS and net devices, any pros or cons ?, Blizbor (IMA) |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |